![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXjS6d0o3ED-t_nYnoY0hsOUifDqZ9hmHJe-DzLn3dTJlddiePPVPen_HedWQJDgCp_b0r9kRi-4R4zMnPfr6TEoUeTA3D5ACClzxFlo87Oo1sDK5dgPAt4u0nhmN0TFE02nu9IvPHUso/s200/agamemnon.jpg)
In doing this, the focus is drawn carefully onto Agamemnon's wife Clytemnestra, particularly her interpretation of Agamemnon's actions, and her primal response to his slaughter of their child. These characters are portrayed exquisitely by the performers in this production, who balance the intensity of their emotions well with the need to edify the audience, as was the tradition of the Ancients.
The interplay between what we can control and what we can't control is one of the things we humans find most difficult to get a grip on. For the most part, we get the things we can control confused with the things we can't; and even when we do know which one is which, we still instinctively try to control the things we can't, ignoring the things we can. In some ways, Agamemnon's story is that of a king who spent ten years doing something about what was out of his control, while unwittingly losing his grip on what he could have had. But then again, Agamemnon was never really about Agamemnon.
Although I may have retitled it Clytemnestra, I love what Rachel Hogan has done with Aeschylus' play, perhaps enough to hail her as the anti-Tolkein. Of course, she may take offence at that (I don't know how she feels about Tolkein) but it is intended to be the compliment of compliments!